Talk:Santa Ana (Amtrak station)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles

Trains: Stations

Trains Portal

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Title and article duplication[edit]

Santa Ana (Amtrak station) and The Depot at Santa Ana are the same station. Might as well have one less Wikipedia duplicate. I recomend a redirect to Santa Ana (Amtrak station) --Marriedtofilm 06:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think its official name is still the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center; something to think about.--Lord Kinbote 07:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. There's been a sort-of standard of naming So Cal station articles "xxxxx (Amtrak Station)" For now I'll start a redirect of that name, but changing the article name to that is not an irrational idea. --Marriedtofilm 07:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did the merge earlier today. I have no strong preference on the article title. Slambo (Speak) 13:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the actual name of this station is the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, I'm seriously thinking of retitling and redirecting the current name to the new one. There are alot of links, as well as redirects to the current title (I'm compiling a list). Is this a good idea? Would anyone have any objections? --Marriedtofilm 05:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]