Jump to content

Talk:Santa Maria in Cosmedin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Roma-Maria-Cosmedin.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Roma-Maria-Cosmedin.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Santa Maria in Cosmedin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Groundbreaking verses dedicated date and consecrated date

[edit]

The church infobox cites the groundbreaking data as being year 782. However, as the basilica incorporates two earlier structures (the Stadio Annonae and an earlier Christian Welfare Center), I suggest the groundbreaking could be earlier (around c600) and the dedicated date and concentrated dates being 782.

Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's a really good point. On the one hand, the church itself wasn't begun until c.780, and the article is about the church. On the other, the church was built into and expanded the diaconia, which seems to have been built c. 550, according to information I found, and was surely used for worship. I like your solution. Nonnabede (talk) 16:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding content and citations

[edit]

Hello, fellow Wikipedians, I'm working on expanding the entry for the Roman basilica of Santa Maria in Cosmedin because a number of sources name it as the most important medieval church in Rome. I'm very grateful to the original authors for sorting out the chronology and discovering important information. After finding more information in archaeological reports and other sources, I've added material on the identities of the buildings that were there before the church, the role and form of the first Christian building on the site, older elements incorporated during rebuilding, and what was accomplished in the 8th-century expansion as opposed to the 12th-century rebuilding. I'm also adding more information on the interior, decoration, and contents of the church and have been able to find sources for most of the unattributed material. I would welcome any corrections, suggestions, and further information. Thank you very much. Nonnabede Nonnabede (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]