Talk:Sarah Milledge Nelson

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sarah Milledge Nelson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archaeology: Women in archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women in archaeology task force.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Image

"These should still be decided on a case-by-case basis, based on an actual analysis rather than simply "they're bad"." you do not have a broad consensus, or policy basis, to remove images. please discuss before unilaterally removing reliable sourced content. --Turktimex3 (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What "reliable sourced content" are you referring to here? The image you want to include does not have reliable sources. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the image reliably illustrates the article subject, more so than the image in Plato. present an argument to remove the image other than "they're bad". --Turktimex3 (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've presented absolutely no evidence that the image reliably illustrates the article subject - either here, on the other pages where you've put forward this same argument, or in the noticeboard discussion you've been pointed to. If you believe that to be the case, the burden of demonstrating that falls on you. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Turktimex3, the onus is on you, as multiple editors have objected. Several times I have directed you to the No Original Research board where there is an active discussion, yet you refuse to participate. If we ever have to escalate this matter to one of the behavioral boards, that isn't going to be a good look for you. Zaathras (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]