Talk:Saxondale

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Saxondale article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Page merge

With only one episode broadcast at the time of writing it might be premature to delete/merge this page as the character may develop and require a page distinctive from that of the series itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacmcd (talk • contribs)

Agreed. --GoAround 20:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah haaaaaaaaa. Sorry, I meant Agreed Budgiekiller 20:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The character article should be merged in here, not least becaue that's where the episode information is. —Wh o uk (talk) 21:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This needs to be merged with Saxondale, as the series has only just started and isn't notable enough (yet) to deserve a page for each of the main characters. -- Boothman _/tɔːk/ 10:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Indeed. It's not even the notability aspect: this would all happily fit in one article. Only if that article became overlong should it then be split. —Wh o uk (talk) 21:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number of episodes is 7 not 6

Series 2 cameo

Who was the actor in episode 1 (maybe 2) who looks like a big Rik Mayall? 86.17.211.191 19:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Davies Candy 21:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hocus Pocus

Changed the line from some to most referring to the use of Hocus Pocus by Focus in the outro. All of S1 have it as an ending with the exception of Episode 1 (House of the King). Most of series two do as well (I was unable to listen to the end of S02E01 to confirm that).

Candy 16:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is all episodes except the very first. Will change text.

Candy 21:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond

Changed "Tommy and his accolades" to "Tommy and his acolytes" - surely the word meant. Zythophile (talk) 08:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Saxondale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060720110448/http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2006/06/11/svcoogan11.xml to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2006/06/11/svcoogan11.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]