Talk:Scholastica (school)

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Bangladeshi Universities (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladeshi Universities, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Bangladeshi UniversitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Bangladeshi UniversitiesTemplate:WikiProject Bangladeshi UniversitiesBangladeshi Universities articles

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Bangladesh may be able to help!

Untitled[edit]

refs? topics? Victuallers 14:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improper Writing[edit]

Despite my efforts to maintain a writing standard on this article, someone continuously keeps reverting back to the poorly written and boastful original. Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia. We are not here to read about a Scholastican bragging about their school. I have been there and know what it's truly like: an encyclopedia article definitely should not be biased. I ask that if there are future occurrences like this, the editor be banned.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.125.64.10 (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although the recent vandalism was obviously inappropriate, I would say that the article still reads promotional as of 2021, —Paleo Neonate – 17:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]