Talk:Scott Kazmir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Poorly written[edit]

This article is really poorly written. The first paragraph is overly redundant (mentions the same trade twice, mentions his high prospect rating like 4 times) and it does not go beyond 2004, despite that he's the ace of the Tampa Bay staff, now, in 2007. I might work on this tomorrow. Mike Murray 04:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

let's get working on this...[edit]

This article still needs much work, including a 2007 season section. Kazmir was the AL K-King, for Zim's sake!

And why was the scouting section removed? Some of it needed updating, but there was no reason to cut out the whole thing, imo. I'll prolly get back on this today or soon, but if this article pops up on your watchlist, feel free to jump in... Zeng8r (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Defense-independent pitching stats[edit]

I removed win-loss since it's one of those "old school" stats that modern GM's ignore. I added non-intentional walks plus hit batsmen and innings pitched (to give readers an idea of K's per inning). But I think other easy-to-understand, defense-independent stats may be better. Maybe we could replace both with strikeout-to-walk?

Also, any ideas for what should replace ERA? There's many metrics, such as dERA, but I can't think of one that's easy to understand. Any suggestions?

Maybe this discussion should take place on a general page about baseball pitchers, not the Scott Kazmir page?

Sas3301 (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed in some detail at WT:BASEBALL. Please see this for a brief but recent conversation. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is written for the general public, not just sabermatically-inclined baseball fans, and certainly not just MLB general managers. While I agree that W-L and other "old school" stats like ERA and K's aren't the best way to numerically evaluate player performance, they are much more commonly used and understood by casual baseball fans, who outnumber sabermaticians by quite a large margin. One day, perhaps a consensus will emerge to replace these infobox stats with newer numbers. For now, however, this is how it's done around here. --Zeng8r (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That pretty much sums up my opinion on the matter. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Scott Kazmir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scott Kazmir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Scott Kazmir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lede[edit]

Hi. I have not done it myself. But the lede I think should not be more than four paragraphs. Maybe someone want to try to make that happen. --2604:2000:E016:A700:F5A1:77F6:3111:3FD5 (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagreed with the above comment at the time, but looking at the lede today, I must admit that I added a few too many details way back when. I streamlined it just now; hopefully it's an improvement. Zeng8r (talk) 22:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Scott_Kazmir&oldid=1206924764"