Talk:Scottish Gas Board

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scottish Gas Board article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This page has been marked as needing an image.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled[edit]

Extracts from a Letter from first Chairman give a rare insight into the issues which nationalisation presented and how one from outside the industry approached them.81.178.227.43 13:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Several matters of interest in these few words - the rundown state of the gas industry in Scotland where, almost all the works was owned by the Local Councils, where the main showrooms were to be found at the Councils' offices and when the gas works, public amenities and social services competed for resources.

The very large number of autonomous undertakings presented the Board with big problems and while integration did not affect the technical side of the business very seriously, on the commercial side very big changes were needed to prevent the industry failing entirely. At one stage, so slow was progress in centralising managerial control that the Gas Council had contemplated managing the industry in Scotland from London.

Notable too are the remarks about pricing. The requirement to relate price to costs and not, as in a free market, to 'what the traffic will bear' and the reluctance to use advertising other than for 'educational' purposes threatened to sink an industry whose product was acknowledged by the public to be 'nasty, smelly, dirty and dangerous'. Selling gas appliances by hire purchase was regarded as unethical by many managers. Electricity had found new markets in off-peak metering (the white tariff) and storage heating and both oil and liquid petroleum gas (LPG) were very successful in bringing modern comfort conditions to households, within and far beyond the restricted area of gas supply. Only the promotion of more efficient gas fires, the adoption of aggressive marketing of gas central heating using door to door canvassing sales teams and the increased efficiency of gas production by the Lurgi plant in Fife prolonged the survival of the industry in Scotland long enough to allow natural gas from the North Sea to give gas a new lease of life. Fenton Robb 19:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice too, the appreciation that reorganisation was seen to inhibit 'management by walking about' and that nationalised businesses were often seen as remote and inhuman. Fenton Robb 19:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marked for cleanup - but no specific suggestions as to exact requirements. Some efforts have been made here, but probably insufficient?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fentonrobb (talk • contribs) 2006-11-01T05:24:44 (UTC)