Jump to content

Talk:Scuba gas management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned references in Scuba gas management

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Scuba gas management's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Mitchell":

  • From Hypercapnia: Mitchell, Simon. "Respiratory failure in technical diving". DAN Southern Africa. Archived from the original on 2021-11-13. Retrieved 6 October 2021 – via YouTube.
  • From Breathing gas: Mitchell, Simon (2015). "Respiratory failure in technical diving". www.youtube.com. DAN Southern Africa. Archived from the original on 2021-11-18. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  • From Scuba gas planning: Mitchell, Simon (2015). "Respiratory failure in technical diving". www.youtube.com. DAN Southern Africa. Retrieved 6 October 2021.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 16:19, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Scuba gas management

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Scuba gas management's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AAUS":

Reference named "pmid21848111":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 18:05, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Scuba gas management

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Scuba gas management's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Bozanic1997":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 09:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

B-class review

[edit]

B
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations.
    It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
    last 3 sections still need inline refs. Nothing likely to be a problem or controversial, and largely common knowlegde in the field, but will take a bit of time to track them down. All paragraphs now have at least one ref. Good enough for B-class checkY
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
    It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
    Probably fairly complete, nothing obvious missing. checkY
  3. The article has a defined structure.
    Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
    Complies. checkY
  4. The article is reasonably well-written.
    The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
    Good enough for B-class checkY
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
    Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
    Reaasonable number of relevant images. checkY
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way.
    It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
    Some technical languge as it is a technical topic. Should be OK. If anyone wants something clarifies, just say so. checkY

Not quite yet. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting to B-class. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 14:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Importance rating

[edit]

I decided to move this up to top importance for Wikiproject:Underwater diving as it is critically important for safety. If anyone disagrees, ping me and we can discuss. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 14:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]