Talk:Scythemen
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scythemen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Scythemen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 August 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Scythemen
[edit]Shouldn't we use English translation of the world such as Scythemen instead? TheEditMate (talk) 23:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- TheEditMate, The term does appear to be more common, kosynierzy is used by fewer sources (from my quick Google Book search). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class Polish military history articles
- Polish military history task force articles
- Start-Class Poland articles
- Unknown-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles
- Start-Class Lithuania articles
- Low-importance Lithuania articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles