Talk:Second Battle of St. Michaels

Second Battle of St. Michaels has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 3, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Second Battle of St. Michaels/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 06:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link Battle of St. Michaels in the lead

Modified last sentence in second paragraph to "About two weeks earlier, the town was successfully defended by artillerists from the local militia when British forces attacked on August 10 in the Battle of St. Michaels." with Battle of St. Michaels Wikilinked. TwoScars (talk) 19:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"the British mysteriously withdrew." - the body doesn't seem to suggest that the withdrawal was particularly mysterious?

Changed the end of the Beckwith section to: Eventually the two sides exchanged fire, but what the U.S. National Park Service calls "the largest Eastern Shore battle" of the War of 1812 lasted for only a few artillery shots and musket volleys. The British "mysteriously withdrew", and the reason for their withdrawal is still unknown.

"and in January 1813 Rear Admiral George Cockburn reported to Warren in the HMS Marlborough" - Cockburn has already been introduced; I don't think you need to give his full name/rank here

Removed rank there and in the last sentence of the paragraph. TwoScars (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The British units are named in the infobox, but aren't named in the body except for the 102 Regt. of Foot, which is listed as a possible unit in a footnote

Named and wikilinked all three units in the text. TwoScars (talk) 21:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Also present were the 26th Maryland Regiment and companies from the 9th Cavalry District" - this feels a bit redundant, given that the bulleted list right before this enumerates the units. Since only portions of these units seem to have been engaged, it might be best to remove the bulleted list and then briefly describe the breakdown of forces as prose

Changed to all prose, removed redundancy. TwoScars (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think militiamen is generally one word, rather than two

Changed to militiamen in all three places. TwoScars (talk) 19:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

" "largest Eastern Shore battle of the war" lasted only a few volleys because the British withdrew" - the source is public domain, so it's not a copyvio, but this is still a little too close of the wording to the source than I find comfortable

See change made under "mysteriously withdrew" section. TwoScars (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend in-text attribution for the "largest Eastern Shore battle of the war" to the NPS

See change made under "mysteriously withdrew" section. TwoScars (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

" Almost exactly one year after the Second Battle of St. Michaels, the British burned the United States Capitol and President's Mansion (White House) in Washington, DC" - since you're mentioning this, and earlier in the paragraph that the British did not assault Baltimore in 1813, should the Battle of Baltimore be mentioned

Added: While Easton and Annapolis were not attacked during the war, Baltimore fought off the British during September 1814 in the Battle of Baltimore. (Battle of Baltimore wikilinked, sentence cited). TwoScars (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and images look fine

Although Buidhe thought three images of the Chesapeake were too many, and removed the first one, I put it back in because I thought it was useful to show where Havre de Grace, Fredericktown, Georgetown, Baltimore and Annapolis were compared to St. Michaels and Easton. The map also shows Queenstown and Tilghmans Island—all places discussed in the text.

Placing this one on hold now Hog Farm _Talk 05:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Might be caught up. TwoScars (talk) 21:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good; promoting. Hog Farm _Talk 15:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]