Talk:SeeFood

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force.

Animation: Asian / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Asian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No user-generated content[edit]

User-generated content is no acceptable source. User reviews (like reviews @ amazon or imdb) are not allowed (see also Wikipedia:UGC). And if you look for example at the amazon user reviews you can see what's evidently wrong with user ratings: A lot ot amazon customers are not rating the movie, but ill-use them for politcal statements, as they are rating a movie with only one star just because it's co-funded by the Al Jazeera Children's Channel (which is apparently the devil for Fox News viewers ;-). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.4.66.147 (talk) 21:34, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that user-generated content is not appropriate. I also removed the Rotten Tomatoes reference because there is no useful information there. RT is used to reference the aggregate score of a sample of film reviews, but there are none on this film's RT page. Other sources will have to be used to determine the critical reception. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]