Talk:Self-Realization Fellowship Lake Shrine

Advertising

Wow! This sounds a lot like it was copied directly from a marketing brochure. This article does not contain even one shred of notable information. DELETE PLOX. ANarc (talk) 02:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Self-Realization Fellowship Lake Shrine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715074640/http://story.philippinetimes.com/index.php/ct/9/cid/2411cd3571b4f088/id/323158/cs/1/ to http://story.philippinetimes.com/index.php/ct/9/cid/2411cd3571b4f088/id/323158/cs/1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Call to action in intro

The introduction leads with two sentences stating the Shrine is closed to standard visitors and requests the reader visit a website for more information. This seems like a strange way to introduce the reader to the topic. Additionally, it seems inappropriate for the page to direct the reader to take an action. Can someone shed more light on this?

DietDrPhil (talk) 05:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks that was a bit abstract.--Riquix (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Placed the important information at the end of the Overview section and highlighted to its own section. Red Rose 13 (talk) 18:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think that has nothing to do with the article. But I think maybe for a short time as long as this is such a massive problem in the USA.--Riquix (talk) 04:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes I agree just until this pandemic is overRed Rose 13 (talk) 11:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Short time as long as the problem in the usa is massive. The problem will go on for another year and a half. I am assuming that this rubric according to Wikipedia is not allowed. This is not the website of SRF/YSS mouthpiece but a neutral lexicon.--Riquix (talk) 11:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]