Talk:Semantic analysis (knowledge representation)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Semantic analysis (knowledge representation) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The title of this article shadows two vastly more important subjects: semantic analysis, as the term is understood in natural language processing, ontology building, semantic web efforts etc, and knowledge representation, again a highly important subject in artificial intelligence. It is particularly unfortunate that the disambiguation page leads here...
I would suggest moving this to "Semantic analysis (library science)" but I don't have the wiki-foo to do it myself, sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.134.197.31 (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I propose that this article be merged into Semantic analysis (linguistics). It does not seem to be substantially different from the other concept, and it still never be more than a dicdef. Bearian (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree - this is distinctly different. Semantic analysis in this context is about how to define an organization by data, as in a graph database, while linguistics is about trying to break down the structure of languages. This is computer science, while the article you're proposing is linguistics. Mamyles (talk) 23:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Libraries articles
- Low-importance Libraries articles
- WikiProject Libraries articles
- Stub-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Stub-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles