Talk:Sense and Sensibility (2008 TV series)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 16:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Initial comments

On first pass, this looks to be solid, comprehensive, well written, and generally ripe for promotion. Thanks again for your work on it! I've seen practically every other Davies series but this one; clearly this will have to be next on my list.

I did make some tweaks as I went; feel free to revert anything with which you disagree, especially if I've accidentally introduced any errors or changed your meaning.

Only one issue I couldn't immediately resolve:

• "^ Flavin 2004, pp. 45" -- does not appear to point to a citation -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for reviewing this article. It seems I forgot to add the book for the Flavin reference, so I've added it now. Your edits to the page look fine to me, thank you for that. I hope you get to watch the series soon, it's really good. - JuneGloom Talk 17:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the speedy fix! Will do that last check now. -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass as GA