Talk:Separation of powers in Australia

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Separation of powers in Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled[edit]

what is the name of the doctrine

This is a highly unsatisfactory article written as if the constitutional solution of the American Revolution were relevant to Australia. All the constitutional input into Australia derived from the UK and the Australian Constitution was largely created by Australian versed in and familiar with the Westminster system. There was no American input. The domestication of the Australian Constitution by the Statute of Westminster (1931), which fornad the Imperial Parliament in London to make legislation applicable to Australia, is not alluded to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.145.81 (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well below standard, and would fail an undergraduate essay question. It is inaccurate, out of date and expressed in clumsy language Thelorikeet (talk) 04:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

German 2012[edit]

@Find bruce and Hut 8.5: "German 2012" might be this; it looks like it was published while an undergraduate, but was quoted here and in the WA parliament. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you may be right although wouldn't that make it "German 2006". It doesn't seem a particularly notable reference in any event. The article could be significantly improved. Find bruce (talk) 19:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]