Talk:Seth P. Waxman

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

relation[edit]

Does he have any relation to Henry Waxman? Wooyi^{Talk to me?} 00:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No.

B.?[edit]

Why does Seth B. Waxman (by which he is cited in the text of the majority decision in Boumediene v. Bush) redirect here? Is it a mistake in the decision? Does he also go by a different middle name? - dcljr (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citizens United vs. FEC[edit]

In light of Seth P. Waxman's contributions to the Citizens United vs. FEC Case, shouldn't it be included in this article?

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310 (2010) is a landmark U.S. constitutional law, campaign finance, and corporate law case dealing with regulation of political campaign spending by organizations.
— Citizens United v. FEC Article

...

Former Bush Solicitor General Ted Olson and First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams argued for Citizens United, and former Clinton Solicitor General Seth Waxman defended the statute on behalf of various supporters.^[1] Legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky called it "one of the most important First Amendment cases in years".^[2]
— Before the Court Section

―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 18:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Hillary: The Oral Argument". The Washington Post.
^ Liptak, Adam (2009-08-06). "Sotomayor Faces Heavy Workload of Complex Cases". The New York Times.

[Ref_a-1] "Hillary: The Oral Argument". The Washington Post.

[Liptak2009b-2] Liptak, Adam (2009-08-06). "Sotomayor Faces Heavy Workload of Complex Cases". The New York Times.

[1]

[2]