Talk:Severn Beach line/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Prose isn't too bad. Make sure years are not linked per MOS:UNLINKYEARS.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Here's where the real problem is. The majority of the article is unsourced.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The biggest problem is the lack of references. Because of this, I'm afraid I'm going to have to fail the article. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)