Talk:Shaandaar (2015 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film spelling correction[edit]

Request to correct film spelling. Proper spelling seems to be 'Shaandaar' as quoted by two credible sources thorough verified twitter accounts Alia Bhatt https://twitter.com/aliaa08/status/508705736248262657 and Phantom Films https://twitter.com/FuhSePhantom/status/509236485371875328 Sid Blue (talk) 15:30, 12 September 2014 (UTC)SidBlue[reply]

YouTube trailer data[edit]

Anyone care to explain the significance of this content?: The trailer hits 6 million views in 12 days of its release on YouTube. Why do we care how many hits the trailer got on YouTube. That's not a measure of the film's potential for success. Seems trivial and promotional, as if we're including that data to attract people to watch the trailer, and thus to see the movie. Everybody wants to be part of the big thing, no? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Estimation[edit]

In this edit, Josephlalrinhlua786 removes, in good faith, {{Estimation}}, explaining, "it's not an estimation anymore. finals arrives at Monday. It grossed $6.75M on 2,500 screens in India alone." I'm not quite sure what he means by this, because from my perspective, it's either an estimation, because there is no reliable central reporting system for Indian box office data, or the data is coming from the primary source. As we know, we should never use a primary source for controversial information like box office take, since the primary source has a vested interest in monkeying with that info. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]