This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stub Class Rationale

It's a stub because it contains precious little information, and does not, in my judgement, meet the criteria of a "Start Class":

Does not have a "meaningful amount of good content." Does not, in fact, have a meaningful amount of content.
Does not have "at least one serious element of gathered materials"-- a graphic, subheadings, or links "that help explain or illustrate the topic."

I created the page because it was in the Bill Bryson template, and it seemed to me there should be at least a stub for such a page because it is a) a book by a noted author and b) part of an existing template of that author's work. CatherS (talk) 09:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undone

The word "provably" was the word intended-- as in able to be proved. CatherS (talk) 09:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]