Talk:Shanghai Airlines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jingan[edit]

http://www.ce-air.com/ceair/static/xsdh/tzzgx/dshgg/2009/201001/P020100104404404683902.pdf mentions that Shanghai Airlines uses particular buildings WhisperToMe (talk) 16:42, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Damaged CRJ-200 at bottom of article[edit]

This picture a) has absolutely no context given, b) is not of great quality as it shows very close up shots of rather ambiguous areas of the aircraft, and c) seems to negate the final section of the airline never having major damage on any of their aircraft. I'm not a professional editor, but I'm rather sure that photograph doesn't belong in this article. Illini407 talk 20:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Shanghai Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]