Talk:Shared residency in England

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPoV[edit]

This law page overlaps with an area of social controversy and it had wandered into NPOV territory. I have therefore recast it more clearly as a law page, retaining the external links to the groups that promote the differing points of view where the more partisan material is available. Obviously, some editors will wish to comment upon the law as here stated which is, of course, acceptable so long as it is not merely their own POV, but a reasoned critique, supported by verifiable authjority in the usual Wiki way. David91 07:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic[edit]

This is written like a law school treatise. Encyclopedic writing has no room for "Discussion" section, or wording like "should be". — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 11:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed rename[edit]

Someone (I don't have the patience to dig out who, from the page history) added the following rename proposal to the article itself, in an HTML comment at the top of the page:

"This article would be better named Shared residence in English family law - see Residence in English law and its talk page for reasons."

— SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 11:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per the original suggestion; this is not about English law generally, and we already have an article on residence, generally, in English law, generally. This about the residence of children in particular, in family law in England (and the rest of the UK that uses English law, i.e. not Scotland). Actually Shared residency of children (English family law) might be even better. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 11:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shared residency in English law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.stanleytee.co.uk/private/pdf/sr.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130127002134/http://www.thecustodyminefield.com/mobile/sharedresidence.html to http://www.thecustodyminefield.com/mobile/sharedresidence.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]