Talk:She's a Mess/GA1

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 22:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Hey! I'm back from my vacation. I'll be reviewing again. And i'll start wtih this... --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 22:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]


#	Section	Statement	Issue(s)
1	Lead	"She's a Mess" garnered generally mixed reviews from music critics; some criticized the lack of identity, however others named it one of the album's best tracks."	Maybe we can enhance the prose: "She's a Mess" garnered generally mixed reviews from music critics, who commented about the "lack of identity" of the song, while others named it one of the album's best tracks." I think the "lack of identity" should be quoted, as it's likely to be challenged. Also, this info doesn't appear on the article body.
2	Writing and recording	"All music and instruments were played by Mars and Levine."	I don't know yet exactly what, but something seems out of place... Iit may be a little confusing.

Nothing else to be noted here. Also, i felt weird when reading the article and without the Background section. of course, this is just a comment about past reviews XD --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 22:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't really source the "lack of identity" since it's a conclusion. Rewritten last sentence of the lead. Till I Go Home ^talk ^edits 01:21, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

but a conclusion of yours? Remember avoiding OR (Just commenting)... I think it is better now. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 01:43, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"wouldn't have sounded much different coming from any other girl band", "just about good enough to forget the absurdity of it being a Sugababes track". Till I Go Home ^talk ^edits 01:57, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it again, except this time with "originality". Till I Go Home ^talk ^edits 02:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now there won't be doubts about if its OR or not. Now it is clearer :) --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 02:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Final comment: I'm a little concerned about the WP:NSONGS guideline since it hasn't charted, but it's my personal opinion and then kind of irrelevant here. The article meets all the criteria, and as a result, it is promoted to GA status. Regards. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 16:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Till I Go Home ^talk ^edits 16:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.