Talk:Sheila Atim/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Alanna the Brave (talk · contribs) 19:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'll be reviewing your article. Comments to follow in the next few days. Alanna the Brave (talk) 19:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

@BennyOnTheLoose: Alrighty -- this review was short and sweet. Prose and MOS formatting are good. Sources and citations are solid, and I'm not finding any copyvio issues (I scanned with Earwig's tool and did some spot checks). The information seems to provide good coverage (I'm not left with unanswered questions) while also keeping to an appropriate summary style. Writing is neutral -- you've included balanced critique of Atim's performances. Article is stable. Images are relevant, tagged and well-captioned. I've made some copy edits to address minor issues in the text, citation formatting and categories, but I'm now satisfied that the article meets GA criteria. I'm happy to pass it. Thanks for the quality work! Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your review and improvements, Alanna the Brave. This was the first article I ever created, so I'm very happy that it's now GA. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 19:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]