Jump to content

Talk:Shellfish allergy/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) 16:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  Pass b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  Pass
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):  Pass b (citations to reliable sources):  Pass c (OR):  Pass d (copyvio and plagiarism):  Pass
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  Pass b (focused):  Pass
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  Pass
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  Pass
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  Pass b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  Pass
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  Pass
    Comment: Currently put on hold, discussion took place on my talk page with the nominator, further need to solve a few more citations needed (templated inside the article), expect to continue this week CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All 'citations needed' resolved by use of existing refs. Ref list check found two "dead" refs. One deleted, as other refs covered the content, and the other replaced by a newer version of the same FDA document. David notMD (talk) 14:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regulations section refs checked. Added text and ref for regulations in Japan. David notMD (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]