Shepperton was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles
Even not yet bit-by-bit having made the changes the assessor suggests, from a relativist perspective, for articles on English small towns, of which there are so many, the article is naturally very good, the bare bones were already in place! The way in which the review has been conducted has been thorough, intelligent and professional. I am sure plenty more interesting places could do with such critique!
Sentences per paragraph is a novel bugbear as to places generally really. Given encyclopedias vary on this point, surely the principle is how much information a long sentence imparts? Paragraphs can be very concise after all.
As to the other points, bear with everyone who wants to help. - Adam37Talk 16:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed quite a few UK towns & cities. I would suggest that a look be taken at some of the articles in Category:GA-Class UK geography articles. Collectively, they are the sort of "benchmark" that this article needs to meet in order to get though WP:GAN without too much effort on the nominator and the reviewer. Pyrotec (talk) 18:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
