Talk:Shergar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleShergar is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 24, 2019.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2018Featured article candidatePromoted
October 23, 2018Peer reviewReviewed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 8, 2024.
Current status: Featured article

Earnings[edit]

I see Shergar earned his owners nearly $700,000. As this was 25 years ago, is there any merit in perhaps also giving the equivalent figure in 'today's money?'

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shergar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

£100 notes[edit]

The page currently states: "Many of the demands were physically impossible: the ransom demand included £100 notes, which did not exist."

However, this is not strictly correct. While the Bank of England does not and did not at the time issue Sterling £100 notes, all four note issuing banks in Northern Ireland did (and two still do). Similarly, there was a £100 note of the Irish Pound in circulation at the time. The kidnappers may well have made "impossible" demands, but asking for £100 notes would not have been one of them. I am therefore deleting the text. Nick Cooper (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve put it back in. NI notes are not legal tender, and the currency would have been extremely difficult (probably impossible) to obtain in quantity. We go with the source here. - SchroCat (talk) 14:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Missing the point, somewhat. Legal tender has a very limited and specific meaning. Bank-issued notes are legal currency, and £100 notes certainly existed at the time (and indeed continue to), so we can't say they "did not exist." We can't slavishly to sources that are demonstrably factually incorrect. Nick Cooper (talk) 22:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you: I was travelling and have only just got home and back to the sources. One of those cited—Baerlein—states "£100 sterling notes". I've clarified within the text based on this source. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 08:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Jalapeño, can you stop edit warring and DISCUSS here please. - SchroCat (talk) 10:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]