Talk:Sherrie Levine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sherrie Levine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

plagiarism?[edit]

Her work consists of taking pictures of other people's work.

So ... Plagiarism?

It was a discussion of plagiarism that led me to this page, and I'm quite disappointed to see that no reference seems to be made to it. Philologick (talk) 03:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Her work fits into a movement in contemporary art called Appropriation. Some people have certainly viewed this as plagiarism, but it's a method of Postmodern Art that questions Modernist ideals related to originality. I don't think this debate would make that much sense to address on a Wikipedia page since it presents a judgment about an artist's work, unless it was put into a balanced section titled "Critical Reception" or something along those lines. Cloud.UCM (talk) 19:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]