Jump to content

Talk:Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Non-free use rationales for both images are in great shape.
  • Additionally, I couldn't find any issues in the infobox.
  • Add a comma after "July 3, 2020" per WP:DATECOMMA.

Background and recording[edit]

  • The last sentence in the first paragraph needs a source.
  • That's about it here, #Recording looks great.

Music and lyrics[edit]

  • This has to be the best-sourced section ever created! Well done.
  • "song which features" → "song that features"
  • "are sentimental" → "are a sentimental"
  • "obsessesing" → "obsessing"
  • "with bonus track" → "with the bonus track"

Title and artwork[edit]

  • In the quote blocks, move the references after Complex.

Release and promotion[edit]

  • Some sentences here have 3-4 sources. I recommend using WP:CITEBUNDLEs to reduce the clutter.
  • "the albums second single" → "the album's second single"
  • Since the sentence is kinda short, remove the comma after "relationship".

Critical reception[edit]

  • Try reducing the use of quotes with the help of WP:RECEPTION.
  • In the #Accolades table make the references column unsortable: ! scope="col" class=unsortable | Ref.

Commercial performance and track listing[edit]

  • Couldn't find any issues in either of these two sections.

Personnel and charts[edit]

  • These sections look good as well.

Certifications and release history[edit]

  • Looks good.

References[edit]

  • Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".

Progress[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Some Dude From North Carolina thanks so much for the comments! I have addressed all of your concerns. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]