This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:27, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
I saw someone just delete the Japanese casualties in many articles(Probably 5 or 6 articles). It seems someone wants to hide the Japanese casualties. I think should not just delete the important data based on reason non-reference because the Korean and Chinese casualties are also non-reference. Why just delete the Japanese casualties to unknown? Actually, it has been tagged citation needed and the tag date is January 2013. Why does the editor say tag"a few years"？ If delete the casualties, should fairly delete both two sides. Both sides are non-reference data. But I hope not delete the casualties of either side. I think can just add a citation needed and wait others add reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miracle dream (talk • contribs) 03:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Not done:{{edit protected}} is not required for edits to unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep sources in English or provide a translation[edit]
There are at least three sources in English for this incident: Turnbull, Swope, and Hawley. I realize that there are non-English sources, but this is the English wikipedia, not Korean or Chinese or Japanese. If you wish to include non-English sources, please provide a translation and try to keep the sources to published academic ones such as monographs or articles.
Also please keep the dates in Gregorian calendar unless otherwise noted. There's no reason to use the lunar calendar first and then put the Gregorian calendar in brackets.
Don't just put in content which directly contradicts another source unless specifically noted. If Hawley says the numbers are 10,000 or 20,000, don't just keep that and put in another number. Qiushufang (talk) 23:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: 