This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Almoravids were not a sect, describing them as such is a POV
There is no need to describe them, i.e. by saying North African, Muslim and Arabic pronunciation. It's already linked and the subject is probably common knowledge to someone who'd land on this page.
Even if we tolerate the use of "invasion" (a loaded word which shud be avoided in encyclopaedic writing), it wasn't one. Almoravids were, at first, allies of Ibn Abbad, and went with an offensive against Chrisitians who were attacking some weak Taifas. So it is more of an ongoing military conflict, where lands are swapping hands and does not amount to a an invasion.
If you think that "invasion" is an absolute necessity, I'm not that bothered, on top of what I just said, it's just not very descriptive of what was going on.
Tachfin (talk) 22:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I disagree (mildly) on all three. Srnec (talk) 16:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
