Talk:Silvermont

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Silvermont article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Electronics High‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page Structure[edit]

I'm looking for input into how to best structure this page. The silvermont microarchitecture will be used in several different SoC families(Bay Trail-T, -D, -M, and -I, Merrifield, Avoton, and Rangeley), all having significantly different structures and capabilities. As well as multiple brands(Atom, Celeron, and Pentium). I'm unsure if it is best to have all of the information on this single page, or if it would be better to break it into separate pages.2601:1:9C80:82:35CA:1F43:97D7:3AB0 (talk) 14:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Devices based on these SoCs[edit]

Please, add devices which use these SoC's, for instance the Asus T100 which uses Z3740. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 21:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That already exists on another page, please feel free to update that page with new information if you have it. 2601:1:9C80:82:C1BF:B5EF:84E0:8D31 (talk) 06:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Trail-T Max Display Resolution[edit]

Can someone please provide reference for the max display resolutions in the tablet section. I can not find it in the datasheets ^[1] or the spec update ^[2] Leobdy (talk) 12:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

L2 cache for 2-core Airmont versions is WRONG[edit]

The Airmont section (as well as the [[List_of_Intel_Celeron_microprocessors#.22Braswell.22_.2814_nm.29|List of Celerons#Braswell) show all the Braswell SKUs having 2 MB cache. This is wrong, although Intel's own ARK shows it too (e.g. http://ark.intel.com/products/87257).

Each Airmont module contains 1 MB L2 cache and 2 cores. The 2-core versions have one defective/disabled Airmont module, so they cannot possibly have 2 MB L2 cache. CPUworld gets it right even though Intel's own ARK gets it wrong :-( 66.87.112.239 (talk) 05:08, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that makes sense since L2 cache is usually tied to the number of cores. --Vossanova ^o< 14:38, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www-ssl.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/atom/atom-z36xxx-z37xxx-datasheet-vol-1.html

[2] ttps://www-ssl.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/atom/atom-z36xxx-z37xxx-spec-update.html

[1]

[2]