Talk:SimilarWeb/Archives/2015

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Issues from September 2014

There are a few issues listed for the article by User:PavelTuchinsky, namely:

This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (September 2014)
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (September 2014)
This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (September 2014)

I don't think the article still suffers from these issues. Is there an objection to remove the notice? -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 08:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Remove - While this one may still have issues, those have been sorted. _Gremlin ^SA 11:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Promotional

Dear Wikipedians, would you please let me know which content exactly looks promotional? As I used only reliable external sources to represent the information. Could you please let me know what changes should be made in order to achieve neutrality. Thanks in advance. Cohentom (talk) 08:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello. First, get acquainted to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Later, use this talk page to suggest edits to your company's page, instead of editing it yourself (or paying someone to do so). --damiens.rf 18:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank for your response, would you please let me know what sources do you consider not reliable, so that I could change them. Can I use the following link to describe Add On function?

(https://addons.mozilla.org/es/firefox/addon/similarweb-sites-recommendatio/)? Cohentom (talk) 06:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

This link can be used as a reference for the existence of this addon and for the features it claims to have. It should be taken into account that this is a primary source. --damiens.rf 13:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Could you please also let me know which sources do you refer to saying:"main sources are lies written by themselves"? Thank you. Cohentom (talk) 08:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Sources that come from promotion material -- sometimes disguised as news itens -- published either by entities closely related to the article subject or by press-releases farms. Threre's a lot of links from similarweb itself and by "similargroup". --damiens.rf 13:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for comments and instructions: I would like to ask if the following links can be used as reliable sources: http://techcrunch.com/2013/09/24/would-be-alexa-killer-similarweb-raises-an-additional-3-5-million/ http://www.crunchbase.com/organization/similarweb/funding-rounds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yossi_Vardi http://thenextweb.com/apps/2013/09/24/unlocking-competitor-analytics/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Alliance,_Baron_Alliance http://www.crunchbase.com/person/moshe-lichtman http://www.venturedeal.com/VentureCapitalFirmProfiles/Docor%20International%20Management.aspx https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naspers http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-similarweb-buys-startup-tapdog-1000926070 http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/24/alexa-comscore-competitor-similarweb-raises-series-c-from-naspers-is-now-headed-to-mobile/

Cohentom (talk) 13:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

I've done all the edits according to your instructions. All promotion related content is removed, only reliable sources are used. Text rewritten, citations provided. Thank you for your help Cohentom (talk) 05:59, 28 August 2014 (UTC)