Talk:Sistine Chapel Choir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part I of this article -- 1 Early History (c.600-1898) -- was written in 1912. It is NOT undercopyright; it is fully under Public Domain! Please do not erase this article; there is not a shred of copyright infringement!

The other sections were written by myself this morning, and I attest that they are original and in the Public Domain.

  • This article has been listed as {{copyvio}} by Coolcat. The first section of the article is protected under copyright, as claimed on this page. The other three sections are not copyright violations, as the editor above attests and an internet search appears to verify. In my opinion, the best course of action would be simply to remove/rewrite the first section of the article, and leave the rest be. Remember to cite sources, however. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) | (contribs) 11:23, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright information relating to the online catholic encyclopedia, from which portions of this article have been copied:

The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume XIV
Copyright © 1912 by Robert Appleton Company
Online Edition Copyright © 2003 by K. Knight
Nihil Obstat, July 1, 1912. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor

Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York

Blu Aardvark | (talk) | (contribs) 11:32, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have actualy restored the sections you mentioned before you posted this ;). The copy vio candidate is blanked. -- Cat chi? 12:01, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

Public Domain Catholic Encyclopedia[edit]

Text from the Catholic Encyclopedia has passed into the public domain. Articles which use text from the Catholic encyclopedia should have the the {{Catholic}} template added. The online site is copyrighted, but that doesn't apply to the 1913 text (read Catholic Encyclopedia). --Duk 01:04, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1913 aplogies for the false alert. :) -- Cat chi? 11:22, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Present quality of the Sistine choir[edit]

I don't think that one can blame the present state of the Sistine choir on Vatican II. That is a too convenient and a too overly used scapegoat. After all, the Anglican cathedral choirs are excellent and go on world tours, but who would pay money to hear the present Sistine choir sing in concert? As a friend of mine who builds organs pointed out to me recently, St. Peter's does even have a proper organ, certainly nothing appropriate for a church that size. If the St. Paul's Cathedral can have a world renown choir, why can't the Basilica of St. Peter?

ArNy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.239.152.174 (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mozart and Allegri[edit]

Doesn’t the story of Allegri’s Miserere and Mozart’s “theft” of it after hearing it performed during Holy Week in the Sistine Chapel merit a mention? Lots of sources, but here’s and easy to digest video. And Miserere (Allegri), of course. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for reminding me, Bmclaughlin9. Your suggestion was timely as I'm currently in the process of expanding the 18th and 19th century section. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which piece was sung by the Rich pizza song by the Sistine choir which peaceful song by the Sistine choir which piece was sung by the Sistine choir Sistine chapel choir every Holy week from c.1638to1870 to[edit]

Which piece was sung by the Sistine choir which piece was sung by the Sistine choir 104.152.239.3 (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]