Talk:Site reliability engineering

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Site reliability engineering article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This page was proposed for deletion by Timtrent (talk · contribs) on 15 June 2021.

Computing: Networking / Software / Security Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Lizthegrey (talk · contribs) has been paid by Hound Technology Inc dba Honeycomb.io on their behalf. COI declared: User:Lizthegrey

Why was it proposed for deletion?

Site Reliability Engineering is a different approach to IT Engineering and was acknowledged by many companies other than Google. I would expect to see a meaningful discussion before there is a resolution. https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/devops/what-is-sre Ronnieroxx (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Site reliability engineering is one of the hottest job titles right now. https://techbeacon.com/enterprise-it/what-it-takes-be-site-reliability-engineer is one such source indicating that 22% of IT organizations have a role titled "SRE" these days. https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/02/are-site-reliability-engineers-the-next-data-scientists/ Lizthegrey (talk) 15:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Google came up with SRE, links are to Google. Just like links about the Toyota Production System would, presumably, link to Toyota. That's not a reason NOT to have a wikipedia page about an industry trend, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.168.59.113 (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While SRE started at Google, right now there are job openings for SRE [1] [2] (even in Wikimedia [3]), Youtube videos [4] [5], Conferences [6], and other resources (RedHat, Atlassian, Microsoft). A better list is here. I'd argue that the article needs to be expanded considerably. (Full disclosure/disclaimer: I'm currently a Google SRE, commenting for myself, not representing Google). sharhalakis 16:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the tag, cleaned up the article, and added further references to non-Google sources. I am a software engineer by trade, but I don't and have never worked for Google (unless you count Google Summer of Code years ago, but I don't). GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good start but I agree the article should be expanded considerably. Jtingiris (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time to remove the "multiple issues" slur?

While the article would benefit from additional information on this large topic, I believe that it's time to remove the "multiple issues" slur. I request that anyone who believes these warnings still apply to reconsider and perhaps remove them if they are now satisfied with the article so far. Respectfully, — HowardBGolden (talk) 17:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any user without a conflict of interest can remove maintenance notices. If someone reverts your removal, then you're expected to discuss on the talk page. Also, I wouldn't call it a "slur", it is a label about the quality of the page. lizthegrey (talk) 21:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]