Talk:Six Sex Scenes

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic literature

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature articles

Notability[edit]

User:TimothyBlue questioned the notability of this work. Per WP:NBOOK a literary work is notable if it "has been the subject of two or more non-trivialpublished works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself." There are three peer-reviewed articles in the references cited in the article, which clearly exceeds this requirement. Lijil (talk) 19:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the template questioning the topic's notability since there's been no response. See table of sources below. Lijil (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
Picot, Edward (2002). "Some versions of hyperfiction". PN Review. 22 (2) – via ProQuest.	Peer-reviewed scholarly article.	Peer-reviewed scholarly article.	More than 1200 words specifically about this work.	✔ Yes
Miles, Adrian (2001-09-10). "Hypertext structure as the event of connection" (PDF). Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. HYPERTEXT '01. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 61–68. doi:10.1145/504216.504236. ISBN 978-1-58113-420-9.	Peer-reviewed scholarly paper	Peer-reviewed scholarly paper	~ Brief mention	~ Partial
Bernstein, Mark (1998-05-01). "Patterns of hypertext". Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia : links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems. HYPERTEXT '98. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 21–29. doi:10.1145/276627.276630.	Peer-reviewed scholarly paper	Peer-reviewed scholarly paper	Used as primary example of the "counterpoint" structure in hypertext fiction	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.