Talk:SkyscraperCity

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 8 July 2020, see discussion.
delete, December 3 2015, see discussion.
delete, January 28 2015, see discussion.
Delete, January 17 2008, see discussion.
delete, April 19 2007, see discussion.

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recreation of deleted page[edit]

Seraphimblade, page fundamentally passes NPP, but could you please review for Speedy WP:G4, since no deletion review found. FWIW, I'd be leaning a weak keep based on its quantity of cites in RS, by analogy to WP:AUTHOR criterion 1, but... (courtesy ping Jklamo) ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 04:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydronium Hydroxide: I'd say it's different enough to be ineligible for G4, but given the number of previous deletions, it probably should be evaluated at AfD again. I'm a little surprised I didn't salt it when I deleted it. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade:, thanks for disconfirmation. I won't nominate it - AFD has more than enough noms already taking up editor time and energy, and the topic is at least of marginal notability - but if someone else does so, they do so. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to set up new AfD, but I think it is waste of time. I have just vague idea about content of last deleted version, so this version was created from scratch. I think that theme is notable, so short sourced article is better than endless cycle of AfD.--Jklamo (talk) 08:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why the web address is blocked on wikipedia?[edit]

is there an explantation to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OussDB (talk • contribs) 02:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/March 2016#skyscrapercity.com. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link above. Its clear to me now why skyscrapercity as a forum is spam blacklisted. However, I do find skyscrapercity good resources for information/references about buildings, transportation and other infrastructure in Malaysia. I guess, it's best to treat skyscrapercity as secondary reference to other primary sources. --sabre23t (talk) 03:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

SkycraperCity logo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

SkycraperCity logo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]