Talk:Slum Dwellers International

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

external link marked as risky[edit]

my browser with SiteAdvisor (by McAfee) plugin showed me a possible risk of site redirected to when trying to access http://sdinet.org http://www.mcafee.com/threat-intelligence/site/default.aspx?url=http://knowyourcity.info/ --77.179.40.123 (talk) 18:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to this page by 217.41.240.15[edit]

Numerous edits to this page by 217.41.240.15 over recent months are clearly a malicious hack job done by anti-SDI intellectuals in South Africa and are in clear violation of wiki policy. However I have retained these edits, with some modifications to achieve balance, in the spirit of engagement, which these anonymous posters clearly do not share. Bluesman101 (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree entirely with the note above. Having worked with many of the federations in SDI, the text is inaccurate and malicious. How sad that a growing global movement that gives the urban poor far more scope to act, to organize, to demand and to show government and international ages far more effective ways of addressing urban poverty is subject to such attacks. --82.4.255.29 (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Long intro[edit]

The "introduction" is rather long -- can someone summarize SDI and what they do in a paragraph or two and then put the more detailed information in the body? Almafeta (talk) 21:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Critiques[edit]

Oddly, the section "critiques" does not contain any information critical of SDI, which gives the article the appearance of a PR article. This situation should be rectified by someone with adequate knowledge of the subject, or the section should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.124.250.5 (talk) 09:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Slum Dwellers International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up[edit]

This article needs some work, I'm going to dump out some of the text here which can then be put back in with references if someone else wants.

  • SDI's practices for change
  • Central participation of women

For SDI, the central participation of women is not just an ideal but a critical component of a gender-sensitive mobilization strategy, which sees men and women re-negotiating their relationships within families, communities, and organizational forms such as slum dweller “federations”. By prioritizing the leadership potential of women, federations alter traditional male domination in communities, in ways that actually strengthen grassroots leadership. Recognising that women are often the true engines of development, SDI uses the savings and credit methodology to develop their leadership capacity, financial management skills, and confidence. By entrusting women to handle such important monetary systems, whereby they are in charge of the precious savings of their neighbours and friends, communities begin to understand the potential of women as public decision-makers and powerful agents of change. In fact, savings and credit activities, apart from their clear financial benefits, serve as a means to bring women out of the home and into the public sphere in a manner that men rarely resent.

  • Savings

Each day groups of women in slum neighborhoods and settlements walk from home to home, and gather small change from each other in order to collectively address the livelihood struggles they share. Through daily interactions, and weekly community gatherings, savings group members begin to articulate what problems exist within their community, creating a sense of shared identity for the women of urban poor communities. Whilst SDI does not exclude men, the reality is that the savings groups are mainly women. Women are often at the center of the household – responsible for the provision of food, school fees, clean water, and a place to sleep. By targeting the poorest women in a settlement, one can be sure that the settlement’s most vital needs will be addressed. Additionally, the structure of savings groups allows members to access short-term loans, which are otherwise largely unavailable to the urban poor. This system of savings & credit prepares communities for medium and large-scale financial management necessary in the slum upgrading projects they are likely to pursuit. Often regarded as the cornerstone of SDI, these savings groups link together to form “federations.”

  • Learning exchanges

Horizontal learning exchange from one urban poor community to another is the primary learning strategy of SDI. Participants within the savings networks learn best from each other. When one savings group has initiated a successful income-generating project, re-planned a settlement or built a toilet block, SDI enables groups to come together and learn from intra-network achievements. The community exchange process builds upon the logic of 'doing is knowing' and helps to develop a collective vision. As savers travel from Cape Town’s Sheffield Road to Kenya’s Mukuru Sinai to India’s Pune, the network is unified and strengthened. Such learning happens not only at the street level but between towns, regions, provinces, and nations. In this way, locally appropriate ideas are transferred into the global dialogue on urban development through dialogue between slum dweller peers. Additionally, horizontal exchanges create a platform for learning that builds alternative community-based politics and “expertise,” challenging the notion that development solutions must come from professionals. In this way, communities begin to view themselves as holding the answers to their own problems rather than looking externally for professional help. The pool of knowledge generated through exchange programs becomes a collective asset of the SDI network. When slum dwellers meet with external actors to debate development policies, they can draw from international examples, which influences government and other stakeholders to listen.

  • Enumerations and mapping

Community planning activities build political capital for communities both internally and externally. Within communities, activities like enumeration (household-to-household socio-economic surveys) and mapping create space for communities to: identify developmental priorities, organize leadership, expose and mediate grievances between segments of the community, and cohere around future planning. Such activities serve as a platform for engagement with governments and other stakeholders involved in planning and setting policy for development in urban centres. Grass-roots organisations promote community-based data gathering to enforce the interests of slum dwellers. REF Mitlin, Diana, Knowledge is power, in: D+C 10 (2016), p. 24. [1] A key aspect of community planning activities is that communities own the information they collect. When they share the data with government, they are able to create new relationships — and even institutions — that make the poor integral role players in the decisions that affect their lives.

  • Partnerships

SDI federations cannot address informal settlement challenges on their own, but they can catalyse change. The key to reaching community driven development at scale is the inclusion of external partners. SDI engages with governments, international organisations, academia and other institutions wherever possible to create relationships that benefit the urban poor. By opening space for slum dwellers to engage in international advocacy at the global level, and by drawing international partners into local processes through key local events, opportunities are created for key partnerships to develop that can impact at both the local and global level. Ultimately, the aim is to create situations in which the urban poor are able to play a central role in “co-producing” access to land, services, and housing.

  • Slum upgrading

There is not, and never will be, a one-size-fits-all approach to upgrading of informal settlements. Each settlement is unique in its challenges, but there are common themes. Informal settlement upgrading is not simply “site and service” or the provision of a “top structure” house. Upgrading is any intervention that improves the physical conditions of a settlement, which in turn enhances the lives of its inhabitants. The most critical emphasis is that this process should happen in situ, where communities already exist. Relocations should always be as a last resort. However, in situations in which they are unavoidable, such as in flood planes or along railway lines, the federations work to ensure that decisions are made in conjunction with the community. SDI projects do not deliver land, services and incremental houses as ends in themselves, but do so as a means to draw in politicians and policy makers in order to challenge and transform institutional arrangements and policies. For SDI this is not only a matter of delivery but also one of deepening democracy.REF See for instance Satterthwaite and Mitlin - Reducing Urban Poverty in the Global South, Routledge 2014

  • Even when the strategies and terrain are different, the struggle is just the same. Certainly the goals are the same: secure tenure, basic services, affordable housing, inclusive cities, effective redistribution of resources and the support for communities to lead these struggles.
  • Key methodologies and outcomes

SDI claims that it makes partnerships work – partnerships between communities, partnerships with Government and with other stakeholders.REF SDI annual Report 2013 SDI makes every effort to ensure that the poor themselves are at the centre of urban poverty eradication strategies and actions. After 21 years SDI has a proud record of securing tenure for hundreds of thousands of its members, providing incremental housing solutions and contributing to infrastructure delivery, especially water and sanitation, in thousands of slums. It has formalized relationships between organized communities of the urban poor and Governments and ensured, as its South African partner alliance puts it, that "no development takes place for us without us being directly involved" REF http://www.sasdialliance.org[permanent dead link]

Mujinga (talk) 20:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To add[edit]

Undoubtedly, the many initial breakthroughs that SDI has achieved are due to the collective involvement of many individuals and groups whose presence the external world could call “charismatic”. Many events and strategies used by SDI are also milestones that could be called “charismatic moments”. The challenge is to institutionalize this charisma in such a way that its benefits remain after the individual or the moment. SDI’s internal and external quest is how to make sure that such institutionalization ensures the unique character of local activism, creating a global presence that is also relevant to local processes, adding value to the plans of the urban poor. This is a difficult process. Institutionalization that comes either too early or too late could lead to a high degree of formality and the estab- lishment of routines which, in themselves, could inhibit creativity and spontaneity and deter mid-course adjustments and spontaneous manage- ment in response to a changing external environment. Not creating rituals and routines, on the other hand, could lead to a loss of resources, a loss of ownership of innovative practices and time wasted in reinventing ideas.

Patel, Sheela; Burra, Sundar; D'Cruz, Celine. 2001 'Slum/Shack Dwellers International (SDI) – Foundations to treetops' in Environment and Urbanization https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095624780101300204 - free access Mujinga (talk) 22:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Slum_Dwellers_International&oldid=1204305677"