Talk:So Wrong, It's Right/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 08:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	"So Wrong, It's Right received a mostly" - maybe use "The album" this time? Third time in that paragraph the album name is used. " the group appeared on a number of Warped Tour dates, as well as touring with Amber Pacific" - verb tense
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Absolutepunk links are no good again, but it is allowed at GA.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Might be misreading, but the date here does not match what the article says: https://www.punknews.org/article/25722/videos-all-time-low-six-feet-under-the-stars
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig came with with Google play, but Google Play indicated they took the content from here (and properly attributed it).
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Fixed the sentences. Re:"Six Feet" video, the September 24 date is the date of the news post (which, rather annoyingly, is only found by using the search box or Google). Yeepsi (talk) 23:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, I was thinking that was probably the case. Might want to add a note to the citation somehow to indicate that. Kees08 (Talk) 21:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]