Talk:Social comparison bias

Impact of recent student edits

This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.

If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.

Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:

0 -No unproductive work to clean up
1 - A few minutes of work needed
2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
4 - More than an hour of work needed

Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 20:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that social comparison bias be merged into social comparison theory. I think that the content in the social comparison bias article can easily be explained in the context of social comparison theory, and would make a welcome expansion of said article.

See the social comparison theory talk page.

PostScarcity (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect title

Before the edits of the students (circa 2012), the article was talking about the social comparison bias, as outlined by Garcia et al:

[W]e hypothesize that people tend to protect their comparison contexts by making recommendations that prevent others from surpassing them on relevant dimensions on which they have high standing, because such dimensions are especially important to their self-esteem.

Garcia, S.; Song, H.; Tesser, A. (2010). "Tainted recommendations: The social comparison bias" (PDF). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 113 (2): 97–101. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.002. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Now the article talks about generic "dangers of social comparison" and is probably an original synthesis. In any case it's not talking about the social comparison bias anymore. I suggest to move this new article, if at all rescuable, and restore the old one here. Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 23:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

btw, this is the last correct version of the article, before it became an essay on social comparison in modern times Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 11:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

and here is the list of citations the garcia paper has on gscholar https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=17628220480392500142&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 11:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]