Talk:Social network game
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social network game article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Social network game" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
[edit]So we need history and broad scope here. I added some of the early successes in the lead. A time line of introduction of various important games, enhancements and records set of users per month and such would be part of the encyclopedia. There were many lawsuits over copyright infringement, look and feel theft and so many take overs. 97.85.163.245 (talk) 08:36, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
clarification about "social"
[edit]99,9% of Zynga Facebook games depends on click begging and wall posts. In my opinion "Social" means:"Do something toghter", "Interact with other players" or whatever. Doom in Multiplayer mode or Hearts on Windows XP have more "Social" aspects than this "Social games" from Zynga on Facebook. (I must admit, I not tested other games on FB). I have no idea who used the term "Social network game" the first time, but why this games are called "Social network games", only because they run on a social network? --Lastwebpage (talk) 20:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Article comment
[edit]"Johan Huizinga defines play "
Not clear to me that Huizinga's definition of play is a consensus view. Although Huizinga is highly cited (>8000 in Google Scholar), it is by no means the only view. See also Sutton-Smith, Piaget, and Peter Smith for complementary view.
Posted on behalf of robertekraut by InstructorCommentBot (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
I need blue whale real link plz give me Darkwab (talk) 07:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Social-network game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140324111518/http://www.consumerlab.es/first-multi-player-game-on-facebook/ to http://www.consumerlab.es/first-multi-player-game-on-facebook/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120625112125/http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-09-28/research/30211715_1_video-ads-zynga-banner-ads to http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-09-28/research/30211715_1_video-ads-zynga-banner-ads
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)