Talk:Social work in the military

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social work in the military article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Additional information:
/
	No existing task force includes this article in its scope; to propose a new one, please leave a message on the main project talk page.

Social Work Stub‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethical Dilemmas

It is unconstitutional to employ military chaplains of certain religious faith groups who do not recognize the civil law granted sexual rights of members of the faith group who are "only" married civilly. Such a U.S. military chaplain by definition serves as an officer of the United States in TWO roles: a religious role and a secular role. Providing secular input (e.g., social work type analysis) to non-chaplain military officials on matters involving religious controversies baits the Constitution. How can a Social Work type analysis pretend to be "Rational Man Behavior Theoretical" when the Faith Group does not recognize sexual rights of members of the Faith Group who are "only" married civilly?

Americentric

This article does not discuss military/social work links outside of the United states. should it be re-titled social work in the U.S military? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.153.251.65 (talk) 15:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]