Jump to content

Talk:Socialist Unity Party (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 31 March 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Socialist Unity PartySocialist Unity Party (disambiguation) – The Socialist Unity Party of Germany is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for 'Socialist Unity Party', and as such the latter should be turned into a redirect pointing towards the former. The disambiguation page would simply be mentioned in a hatnote. Loytra (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink).  — Amakuru (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Natg 19 (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to what policy? If something is very clearly the primary topic, I'm not at all sure why a move would be considered contested or controversial. Loytra (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Socialist Unity Party has gone from primary redirect to dabpage, then back to primary redirect, then back to dabpage. See WP:RMCM: "A move is potentially controversial if (...) there has been any past debate about the best title for the page; someone could reasonably disagree with the move." 162 etc. (talk) 04:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I accept that. Guess I'll just start a regular move request then? Loytra (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.