Jump to content

Talk:Socotra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

UAE supported militants and takeover

[edit]

@Chipmunkdavis This article is about the geographic location and not the political/administrative Socotra. The UAE invasion of socotra is given much more weight in the article compared to other- more significant-invasions of socotra by the british, the Portuguese, the ethiopians, and other entities even though the UAE control lasted for less than a month. I say that we should not include the UAE backed STC militants in the lede as it is not important and is barely mentioned in the main article and we also should either shorten the UAE invasion section, which is an easy thing to do, or expand the history section to add more details of socotra under the rules of the british, portuguese, mehris, south yemen, and the modern-day unified Yemen. Abo Yemen 10:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about both, it is for example using the Governate infobox. I would agree the UAE article section should be mostly shifted to the main History page, but that does not mean removing mention of governance from the lead, which has the current situation. The lead should also be expanded with more information from other sections. CMD (talk) 10:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it is going to stay then we have to include that the STC is a part of the PLC which is the internationally recognized government of Yemen Abo Yemen 10:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Might be worth an aside to contextualise the claim of separatism. In general that and more should be covered in the article, where only the districts are covered (and even then, not in any detail). CMD (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]