Talk:Soft lithography

Soft lithography was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 1, 2006). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Good Article nomination has failed[edit]

The Good article nomination for Soft lithography has failed, for the following reason:

There is no real prose here to review. Both main sections are lists - they should be converted to normal prose. Also (in the words of Rogers and Nuzzo, p. 50, as cited in "References") is unnecessarily verbose - use the <ref> tag to indicate where statements are sourced from. See m:Cite.php. Worldtraveller 21:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok we need to form a project or at least a taskforce to clean this area up. I will attempt to do so in the next few daysUser:mystic force

This article is a confused mess. It is titled soft lithography, but spends most of its space discussing microcontact printing. In some places, it discusses microcontact printing as something that can be done with soft lithography (true), but in others it seems to be using the term soft lithography to refer to only microcontact printing. 152.20.154.200 (talk) 15:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ODT?[edit]

Is ODT octadecanethiol? Moletrouser (talk) 10:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]