Talk:Sohrab Sepehri
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Excuse me, but we really need to look into the fact that “Address” is mistranslated. Most notably the phrase “Where Is The House of The Friend?” is missing. This is an important phrase because it serves, along with the poem, as an outline for the plot of the film of the same name. (Mchelada (talk) 02:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC))
Mindless Subjective Gibberish
[edit]"His poetry is, indeed, like a journey. Every time you read him you understand him differently. There is a bottomless ocean of meanings in his poetry."
Not very encyclopedic. 99.255.44.133 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC).
Appreciate Ya
[edit]Thanks for uploading such great content on influential Iranian poets and writers such as Sepehri. This info is greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ditc (talk • contribs) 06:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Nonesense
[edit]This article needs a major rewrite. Where do you come up with things like "New generation of Iranians, Sepehri's most avid readers, are more liberal and less prejudice, [old fashion thinkers] than the last generation. They are very eager to explore the world around them, and that leaves no doubt why Sepehri's characteristics in his poetry appeal to them very much. His poetry has become the language of the new generation, a generation that seeks new ideas, the generation that wants a bloodless revolution in many aspects of the old fashioned Persian life. In the last two decades, religion has been ruling Iran in all aspects of social and political life. Iranian youngsters encounter a paradox between their personal life and their social life. With the introduction of computer and internet, a huge wave of western culture has penetrated to Iran; however, the old fashion side of the society seems to remain unchanged. Still people have to fake their religions and beliefs, and there is no tolerance toward people who want to choose a path outside of the religion’s box."? Encylopedic content must be verifiable, and that clearly isn't
128.200.104.29 (talk) 16:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Totally concur with your evaluation of the text: an utter nonsense (aside from the trivial fact that Sepehri is very popular with the youngsters), written or copy-pasted by someone who clearly knows nothing about Sepehri and less about poetry itself; just ignorant platitudes by someone who has mistaken an encyclopaedia entry with a party-political platform. As far as I am concerned, the piece can be removed in its entirety. Truly, I cannot believe that some can take such liberty with facts just for advancing their political views. --BF 17:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in People
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- Start-Class vital articles in People
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles