Talk:Sol de Mañana/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DimensionalFusion (talk · contribs) 20:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

---

This article looks pretty good at a cursory glance, can't wait to get into it

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   The prose is clear and consise, and easily understandable to a broad audience

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Appropriate elements follow the manual of style

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   References are appropriately listed and consistently formatted.

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   Inline citations are fully appropriate and back up the corresponding claims

   c. (OR):

   Article does not contain any original resource

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

   The article does not contain any copyright violations

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   The article addresses the main aspects of the location and goes into appropriate detail

   b. (focused):

   The article does not go into unnecessary detail on any particular topics

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article does not lend any undue weight to any opinions

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit warring as far as I can tell

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   Media is used really well in this article and is suitably sourced from wikimedia commons

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All media is fully relevant to the topic

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

   This is definitley a great article, and I really enjoyed the use of media

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.