Talk:Solo (Boyd novel)
Appearance
![]() | Solo (Boyd novel) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 16, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Solo (Boyd novel)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 20:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I will review this article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- In the lead, link hardback and ebook
- Why is citation 1 needed in the lead?
- "Boyd modelled his version" This far in the article, you haven't mentioned William Boyd yet, so you should be including his first name there.
- The Boyd image caption doesn't need a period
- "although that was 48% down on Jeffery Deaver's" You've already given Deaver's full name; the "Jeffery" can be omitted
- "before being collected by seven Jensen Interceptors before being" avoid repetition of "before being"
- slight re-phrasing removed both. - SchroCat (talk) 08:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- In the lead, you say "ebook", in the Release and reception section you say "e-book". Be consistent
- ""far superior to the last effort to breathe life into a Bond novel by Jeffrey Deaver"" Shouldn't this be Jeffery Deaver?
On hold now. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 00:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Many thanks TT: all your comments dealt with and acted on. Thanks for taking the time and effort to review this: it's much appreciated. - SchroCat (talk) 08:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- No problem, you're very welcome. Happy to list this as a Good Article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's great news: thanks very much indeed! - SchroCat (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)