Talk:Somalia at the 2016 Summer Paralympics
Appearance
![]() | Somalia at the 2016 Summer Paralympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 15, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Somalia at the 2016 Summer Paralympics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Somalia at the 2016 Summer Paralympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 08:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Somalia was one of six countries to make their first appearance in the Paralympic Games: the others were Aruba, Congo, Malawi, São Tomé and Príncipe and Togo. I think that should be a semicolon, since it is separating two sentences. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Add the trans-title parameter to relevant citations |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Was copied from here, no concern. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
The committee had attempted to recruit a goalball team composed of blind athletes but a lack of time meant they failed to qualify for the Games. Did they manage to compose a team and did not have time to qualify, or did they fail to compose a team at all? |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Yup |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
- @Kees08: I have taken action on the points you have raised. MWright96 (talk) 09:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class Olympics articles
- Low-importance Olympics articles
- GA-Class Paralympics articles
- Paralympics task force articles
- WikiProject Olympics articles
- GA-Class Africa articles
- Low-importance Africa articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Somalia articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Somalia articles
- WikiProject Somalia articles
- Articles created or improved during the WikiProject Africa 10,000 Challenge
- WikiProject Africa articles