Talk:Sonia Sotomayor/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am beginning a GA review of this article. I will watch the article for a week prior to reviewing to allow for any further edits and/or comments others would like to make. Please feel free to leave any questions, comments and other reviews below. Thanks! The V-Man ^{(Said · Done)} 18:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-GA Questions, Comments and Other Reviews[edit]

'

In my personal opinion without making any edits myself on this particular article, i think it is as close to GAn you could come. No big issues of any kind. i Might not be the best to review but that my opinion.--Judo112 (talk) 11:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After a wider review myself i still find it suitable and worthy of GA status.--Judo112 (talk) 17:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA REVIEW - Pass[edit]

I can't find any GA reason why this should not be listed as a GA. In fact, I would suggest a FAC review. Congratulations to all editors! The V-Man ^{(Said · Done)} 15:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Post-GA Questions, Comments and Other Reviews[edit]

This is great news, congrats to all the contributors. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]