Talk:Sonnet 129/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xover (talk · contribs) 20:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Overall status

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Beginning review, more to come. --Xover (talk) 20:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Given the apparent extensive copyright violation in this article (5 sections, quite literally half the article, are in whole or in part verbatim copies of various web pages; who knows how much has been copied from offline sources), I'm not going to bother reviewing it in detail.

I'm quickfailing this review. Please feel free to renominate once you've resolved the copyright violations in the article. --Xover (talk) 21:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Detailed points

Lede

• (6) The article lacks illustrations. Could perhaps a cropped scan of this sonnet from the 1609 quarto be added?
• Large portions of the lede is copied verbatim from poetryfoundation.org and as such is a copyright violation. The entire section will have to be rewritten from scratch.

Paraphrase

• Parts of this section bear suspicious similarity to shakespeares-sonnets.com and as such may be a borderline copyright violation.

Structure

• Large portions of this section is copied verbatim from poetryfoundation.org and as such is a copyright violation. The entire section will have to be removed and rewritten from scratch.

Context

• This section is copied verbatim from shakespeares-sonnets.com and as such is a copyright violation. The entire section will have to be removed and rewritten from scratch.

Couplet

• Large portions of this section is copied verbatim from shakespeares-sonnets.com and as such is a copyright violation. The entire section will have to be removed and rewritten from scratch.